One-at-a-timing

So much of the modern church strikes me this way, like Pappy O’Daniel, who only wants to be a big shot, ignoring the “electorate” right in front of him in favor of the opportunity to “mass
communicate.”  Big conferences, bestselling books, famous celebrities.  Who’s got the biggest building, the biggest budget, the best show?   We need to get the message out to as many people as possible. Filling arenas with fifty thousand people.  Multi-site, seeker-sensitive, on and on it goes.  What’s a little deception / “marketing” if it makes my book a bestseller?  What matters is, we’re “mass communicatin’.”  Question the theology, question the methods, ask whether it’s quite biblical, and what do you hear?  “How many people did YOU preach to this week?”  He’s reaching people for the Lord.  Who cares if he’s cutting a few corners?
It’s driven by a theological focus, almost to the exclusion of everything else, of the “moment of decision.”  Decisionism refers to the tendency to think that the only thing that matters in salvation is the moment when someone makes their “decision for Christ” and to focus all our efforts on that moment.  But we are called to make disciples to Christ.  Jesus warned us about the large numbers that would respond in some sense to the gospel but would fall away.  We are called, as the church, to shepherd the flock, to care for God’s people, to protect them from lies, to rebuke sin, to comfort the brokenhearted.  How can a pastor do that if he’s got four thousand people in his church?  How can he shepherd someone at a conference?
Of course that’s the charitable interpretation.  The uncharitable one is that pastors, just as much as anyone else, are susceptible to the world’s siren call of money, of fame, of the world’s approval.  In the church that call is all the more seductive because it’s so easy to dress that call up in church clothes, to say that I only want to be famous so I can reach more people; I only want to be rich so I can more easily do the work of the ministry.  I recently listened to a lecture by Alastair Begg in which he was warning the ministry against the sin of pride, and said that every single pastoral fall, every single disaster he’d seen in the ministry, was caused first and foremost by pride.  I believe it.I’m not against conferences.  I’m not against books or radio programs.  But we should not mistake those things for the work of the ministry.  They can be aids to the work of the ministry.  But the work of the ministry is always “one-at-a-timing.”  It is walking alongside people, loving them, getting to know them, laughing with them, crying with them, rebuking them, being rebuked by them.  It’s preaching the word, ministering the sacraments, teaching publicly and from house to house.  This is the only way the ministry works or has ever worked.  These are the tools the Lord gave us to make disciples, and they’re the only ones that work.The preaching of a sermon is not the end of the pastor’s responsibility. He preaches the word as an expression of a pastoral relationship.  That means that when you prepare a sermon, you do so with particular people in mind, the people in your congregation with all their needs and hopes and shortcomings in mind as best as you know them.  I never feel like I’m really preaching when I preach at someone else’s church.  And the preaching “publicly” must be combined with preaching “house to house” (Acts 20:20).  The public proclamation of God’s word must be followed up with discipline, counseling, encouragement and exhortation which is tailored to the individual.

The work of the ministry, from the world’s perspective, will always be horribly inefficient.  You pour your time into people who end up rejecting the church, who walk away from Christ.  Or you spend your time shepherding people who continually fall back into sin over and over.  You spend hours and hours, years and years, trying to get people to see things that maybe they never see.  And if that’s your model of ministry, it’s just not scalable.  It will not work once your church hits about 200.  It takes too much time.  As a result, you’re unlikely to
ever be famous, to ever have a name on the New York Times Bestseller list (or to ever have enough money to buy your way on).  It’s inefficient.  It requires spending a lot of time to train a man, educate a man, screen a man, just so he can spend his life probably in obscurity toiling among a small group of people.  But it’s the only way to do the job.

This is not a “poor me, being a pastor is so terrible” kind of article.  I love being a pastor and can’t imagine being anything else.  The joy I get when I see people, over years, respond to the teaching of the Word and grow in grace and love toward God and their fellow man is a joy that is unmatched by anything I have experienced.  I wouldn’t trade it for the world.  But it’s so easy to get our minds off God’s promises and on the allure of the world.  To fully reap the benefits of the ministry, we must be realistic about what it is and what it isn’t, and be in submission to the One who called us to the work.Whose approval are we looking for?  If your goal is to make disciples, then “one-at-a-timing” is the only way to do it.  That’s the way the Lord has given us to do it.  The faithful servant does not decide for himself what job or position he wants to do.  He doesn’t neglect the work that the master gave him in order to do work that he will find more fun and exciting.  The faithful servant will not ignore the master’s clear written instructions in favor of strong feelings within himself about what he would rather do.  The faithful servant will obey his master, seeking only the master’s approval, and trusting the master with the results.  The kingdom of God is and always has been built one heart at a time.

2 Timothy 4:1 I charge you therefore before God and the Lord Jesus Christ, who will judge the living and the dead at His appearing and His kingdom: 2 Preach the word! Be ready in season and out of season. Convince, rebuke, exhort, with all longsuffering and teaching. (2Ti
4:1-2 NKJ)

Advice for Preachers, from Jay Adams

A post from Wes Bredenhof pointed me to the blog of Dr. Jay Adams, very well known for his counseling approach, but who also has great advice on a wide variety of subjects for pastors.  As I am repeating sermon series that I have done in the past, I’m finding his advice here to be very true.  I tended to try to cram a lot in at earlier times in my ministry, and now I say more about less, frequently splitting old sermons into two sermons, or preaching an extra sermon on the same text.

If I took 25 minutes to tell you about one event on one night at one place last summer, I could tell all—colorfully, interestingly, and in a way that you could understand. Instead of hurriedly racing hither and yon, I could stop, examine in detail, describe in depth, delineate and delete! But all of last summer? Why, all I could do is vaguely sketch what took place!

As I get older in the ministry, I realize how much better it is to say one thing well than twenty things badly.  Just saying one thing well is challenge enough.

Naturalism and the Possibility of Truth

Thoughts inspired by and collected from Alvin Plantiga’s Where the Conflict Really Lies:

Naturalism is the philosophical position that only natural phenomena exists.  According to the naturalist, everything that we see is therefore the result of the laws of nature.  Life exists as the result of unguided evolution, the gradual selection in living organisms among random genetic mutations for those mutations that make it more likely that the organism will successfully reproduce.
People in the past and present believe a great many things that are not true.  If unguided evolution is true, then religion is one example- most of the people of the world believe in God or a god of some kind, and in the past this was even more true than it is today.  Why did they believe these things?  If unguided evolution is true, then they believed it because it provided some survival advantage.  It is not necessary to even know why belief in evolution provided a survival advantage. We know it did because most people possessed the trait, and the trait would not have been so nearly universally selected unless it provided some such advantage.  Belief in religion causes the believer to expend a great many resources in the pursuit of his religious belief; if it did not provide some serious advantage, such a detrimental belief would soon be bred out, as those that believe it would be less fit for survival.  The normal explanation by Darwinists is that belief in religion is advantageous, or was in the past, because it encourages cooperation with others through the idea of absolute morality.  But the mechanism is ultimately unimportant; we know it provided a survival advantage because otherwise it would not exist.
But here’s the problem- according to the believer in unguided evolution, belief in a God that guides everything is false.  Therefore a false belief provides a survival advantage.  For a belief to be evolutionarily advantageous it is not at all necessary that the belief is true, only that it provides some advantage to the survival and reproduction of the species.  Friedrich Nietzche, the atheistic nihilist, expressed the consequence of this belief well when he said that there is no more unfounded assertion in all of human thought than the assertion that truth is to be preferred to falsehood.  In his book Beyond Good And Evil he asserted that the only thing that is real is the will to power- not truth or falsity, good or evil.

But if he’s right and beliefs can be held by many billions of people simply because those beliefs provide survival advantages, then how can we have any confidence in any of our beliefs?  In that case our minds are wired by evolutionary biology to believe things because they help us propagate, not because they are true.  And that includes our belief in unguided evolution.  Thus naturalism, the belief that only matter exists and all that is is the result of blind chance and natural laws, and random selection of genetic traits produced all the life that we see, renders all knowledge impossible and makes any assertion of the truth of one proposition over another a meaningless assertion.

One can repeat the same exercise with beliefs such as racism and sexism, things we Christians would agree are false.  And it can be repeated ad infinitum with any number of beliefs that people held in the past.  In the past they were believed because they provided a survival advantage.  Therefore evolution can and very frequently does result in people being hardwired to believe false things for survival advantage, and thus unguided evolution results in minds that are hardwired to believe what helps them survive and propagate, not what is true.  Natural selection ought therefore to select for people like Genghis Khan, who very successfully propagated his genes throughout Asia and Europe.  And the result is the complete overthrow of any such conception as truth.  Only the will to power remains.

Give us This Day Our Daily Bread

Why pray, “Give us this day our daily bread”, when the ungodly often have as much bread as the godly?


First, because the godly know their bread comes from God, and are thus incalculably better off than the one who does not know that. Knowledge of God is much more important than bread.


Second (related to the first), because while the ungodly might have bread in the short term, eventually all of God’s blessings will be cut off from the one who never learns to acknowledge God in thankfulness as the source of all he has.

Science requires Faith

More thoughts:

The scientist sacrifices a huge amount of time and effort and money to understand the world he lives in.  He fails, over and over and over and over again.  Why does he keep trying?  Why doesn’t he just go have a beer?  Life is short.  Why bother?

The atheist scientist has no reason to ever expect that his efforts will be rewarded.  There is no necessary reason at all why his quest should succeed.  Why should the universe be known?  Why should things make sense?  How can he justify his sacrifice?

The Christian scientist (or the scientist who has unwittingly assumed Christian principles) has every reason to continue.  He believes, because the Bible tells him, that the universe is orderly and knowable, and that God created man to know and understand the universe; to be in dominion over it.  Therefore he believes, despite all evidence to the contrary, that his efforts will be rewarded.  His years of failure are not wasted.  He presses on.

Science requires faith.

Knowledge and the Atheist

Atheism is supposed to be the philosophy of evidence, which
seeks explanations and understanding of the world we live in, instead of just
resorting to “magic” to explain things.
A few of the things that the atheist must account for in his thinking:
Why anything exists?
Why it exists in an orderly fashion?
Why it exists in a form that is able to support human life?
Why it exists in a form that is understandable?
Why we exist in a form that is capable of understanding it?
Why we exist in a form that is capable of making value
judgments about how things ought to be?
Why such value judgments are possible and valid in the first
place?
Why knowing truth about the universe is important or
valuable, let alone possible?
Why billions of people claim to have experienced the answer
to these questions, having had a personal encounter with the divine?  Why they are all lying or ignorant, while the
atheist is right?
So we have lots of questions which the atheist can only
answer, “It just is.”  Christianity on the
other hand has an answer to the question which holds together logically and is
backed by evidence that is appropriate to the question being proved.

Atheism often accuse Christians of a “God of the gaps”, or just invoking God
whenever we can’t explain something.  But
the atheist invokes the cosmos, whenever he can’t explain
something.  He says, “it just is.”  The Christian, when faced
with something he doesn’t understand about the cosmos, can say that we know God
made it that way and we don’t understand it, yet we have confidence that we
will understand it one day since God intentionally created the cosmos to be
understood by us.  The atheist, when
faced with something he doesn’t understand about the cosmos, must simply say
that it is the way it is for no apparent reason, and he has no reason at all to
believe that he ever will understand it. 
The atheist cannot confidently say that he understands anything at all
now.  He has no reason to even believe
that his mind and senses are giving him accurate information about the world.

Christianity made the scientific revolution possible.  Atheism leads logically to nihilism and the
denial of all truth.

What the Devil Cares About

The devil wants you in hell.  He wants to destroy you.  That is his whole mission in life.  He stalks about like a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour.

The devil doesn’t care about abortion, or gay marriage, or evolution.  Believing in the Biblical teaching on any of those doctrines will not save you.  He only cares about one thing- the cross of Christ.  Only faith in the cross can save you.  So the devil uses all those other things to open up chinks in the Christian’s trust in the Bible so that he can attack the one thing he really cares about.

That’s why everything the Bible says, including what it says about abortion, gay marriage or evolution matters- all of those things exist inside the wall of the infallibility of Scripture.  If you let the enemy inside your wall because he promises he won’t steal your greatest treasure, but only some smaller things that you think are unimportant, don’t complain when he doesn’t stop with those things.  If you let the thief in your house when he promises only to steal a little money, you have only yourself to blame when he steals it all.

Don’t let the devil inside your house.  Don’t believe that he will stop with abortion, or gay marriage, or evolution, any more than Hitler stopped with the Sudetenland.  He’s after the whole kit and caboodle and he won’t stop until he gets it.  Defend the wall at every point, even and especially where it’s most seriously attacked.  Defend the authority of Scripture on every point regardless of how unpopular it is.  Because regardless of what you think is at stake, the same thing is always at stake when it comes to the authority of Scripture- the cross of Christ, and your soul.

We Need to Keep the Sabbath

I am not a Sabbatarian.  By that I mean that I do not believe that the religious observance of days is mandated in Scripture for New Testament believers.  I believe we are called together to worship at times and places decided by the church, and we should be there.  But I do not see any mandated schedule for that in the New Testament.

That being said, the Sabbath was always about a lot more than the observance of a day.  That was only an outward sign of something much bigger.  In Exodus 31:13 (repeated in Ezekiel 20) God tells them that the Sabbaths were given to the children of Israel as a sign that “I am the Lord who sanctifies you.”  To “sanctify” means to be made holy, to set apart, to bless, to save.  He was calling them to deliberately give up some of their productive labor as a recognition of the fact that their productive labor was not the source of their blessed state.  In Deuteronomy 5, in the second giving of the Ten Commandments, God uses their deliverance from Egypt as the reason for the Sabbath commandment- they had worked for 400 years without a day off in Egypt and had nothing at all to show for it.  Their blessing came from God, not their labor, and the deliberate restriction on labor was there to teach them that.

Far too many Israelites turned right around and made a different kind of work out of the Sabbath.  They thought that through their scrupulous keeping of the Sabbath day that God would be bound to bless them.  To this day many Orthodox Jews believe that the proper observance of two Sabbaths in a row will result in the coming of the Messiah and the Blessed Age.

It is ironic to me that too many today who continue to believe in the observance of one day in seven as a holy day view it as a way to secure God’s blessing.  “If we just obey the law properly, then God will bless us.”  But this is the very opposite of the meaning of the day, which is that God’s blessing to us is free and independent of our own obedience.  Our obedience always follows His blessing- He sanctifies us.

But the even larger problem is the great many Christians who are so busy chasing after the blessed state in this life that they never leave themselves any time at all to quietly meditate on the things of God, whether individually, in their families or in their church.  We spend our time running after money because we believe that money will give us the blessed life.  We are so busy in our family life that we neglect the thing our children really need, which is a real relationship with the God who saves.  We pour our time and energy into exercise and diet thinking that good health is the key.  We spend our time and money on entertainment, on vacations, on food and drink.  We never have a second to stop and relax, to simply love others, to peacefully meditate on God’s word.

In this mindset, balance is always impossible.  Every individual will have their own god, their own idol, their own vain lie about what or what combination of things will give them what they want.  Money, pleasure, health, family, community, politics, religious activity, academic pursuits- everyone will pick one or two or three of those things and pursue them to the detriment of the others.  When religious importance is attached to the things of this world, moderation is not possible.  Idols always demand total devotion.  So we get the glutton, the drunkard, the fornicator, the workaholic, the greedy, the wrathful, the miser, all of them trying to eat things that aren’t bread.  We get the ascetic, the man trying to discipline his body in a hermit’s cave or in a health club in order to achieve that blessed state.

“Why do you labor for that which is not bread?”  the prophet asks the people of Israel.  Why do they spend their time and effort chasing after foreign gods that cannot save them any more than they save these other nations?  Israel looked at Assyria with their fearsome chariots, or Babylon with their great wealth, or Egypt with their fine luxuries, and said, “We want what they have,” and adopted their ways and religions in an attempt to get it.  But they had something so much greater.  They had the God who saves.  Where are the Assyrian and Babylonian and Egyptian empires today?  And yet the people of God go on, while the great empires of the past are relics for archaeologists to study and children to be bored by in museums.

We need to just stop.  Stop our busy schedules.  Stop running around.  Stop trying to achieve the blessed state through our own works.  It will never happen because we cannot bless ourselves.  God saves us.  We need to take a Sabbath, a Sabbath in our hearts, to remind us of that.  We will never be able to get enough money, have good enough health, have the perfect vacation, watch the perfect TV show, build the perfect church, to achieve the blessed state we want.  We can’t.  It’s a cursed and fallen world and no effort of ours will ever overcome the effects of that curse on the world.

This is the whole message of the cross.  The cross is what was necessary to save us.  And how can we add anything to that?  We’re like Israelites in slavery thinking that if we just work a little harder maybe our slavemasters will let us go.  We don’t need to work harder, or smarter.  We need to be saved.

Then we can simply, quietly, peacefully, rest in that salvation, in the knowledge that Jesus paid it all.  Then we can, coming from that place of rest, begin to get busy doing the work God has given us to do- caring for our families, working at our jobs, taking care of our bodies, enjoying God’s beautiful earth, loving other people, not because we think we will add so much as one minute to our lifespans by doing so, but out of that thankful and peaceful love that flows from the knowledge that all the work is done already, and has been for two thousand years.  The blessed state is already achieved, and all there is left for us to do is to learn how to enjoy it.

So on second thought, I am a Sabbatarian, a New Testament Sabbatarian.  Every Christian desperately needs to stop their vain attempts to secure their own happiness through their works, and rest in Christ.  Take time out from your too-busy schedules to read your Bibles, to pray, to love your families and your churches- not on any particular schedule, but every day of your lives.  At your workplace- rest in the knowledge that God puts the bread on your table.  At play- rest in the knowledge that God is your joy and your pleasure.  At the gym, know that your health is in God’s hands and you won’t live a minute longer or have any better quality of life than He gives you, and that in the blood of Christ your bodies will be raised to glorious eternal incorruptibility.  On vacation- rest in the knowledge that all the joys of heaven are yours, after you have suffered a little while.  Let the Sabbath principle infuse every breath you take and every work you do.

The Sabbath principle will make the difference between the mad and desperate scrambling that characterizes so many lives, the destructive and miserable pursuit of the lying temptations of this world that is ruining our families, our churches, our nation- and the peaceful and joyful working at whatever God puts in front of us to do.  The Sabbath principle will give us that long-sought-after balance, enabling us to start to understand how to work as much as is right, to play as much as is right, to rest and pray as much as is right, to study as much as is right, all done in the desire to thankfully and peacefully experience all the blessings God is giving His people.  Once we realize that He doesn’t need our work to bless us any more than He needed the Israelites’ input to free them from Egypt, then we can rest in Christ’s perfect and finished work every day and every minute of our lives.  We can give up any vain dream of blessing ourselves through our own efforts, and seek simply to serve Him in thankfulness, peace and joy, to experience the fullness of His salvation.

A Religious Relationship

Some people say, “It’s not a religion, it’s a relationship.”
  I am curious why one thinks that these
two ideas are mutually exclusive.   A
religion is a relationship, a connection between God and man expressed
in certain defined doctrines and practices. 
One would be hard pressed to find anyone within Christianity who would
actually say that the empty performance of religious ritual is a good
thing.  Our worship ought to be a matter
of the heart, or in other words a matter of sincerely held belief, and not just
vain formalism.
If this is what people mean when they oppose religion to
relationship, they’re right, though I fear that they often mean something else.  Often, by “relationship”, people seem to
emphasize entirely just one side of that relationship, their own, so that by a
“relationship” they really mean an experience, a feeling, a particular
emotional ecstasy.  Too often it seems
that it is the very idea that God has regulated our relationship with Him that
people find offensive.  Is it the case
that we want to be in control of the way that relationship functions, of how
and when we experience that relationship? 
It is a relationship, but because God is who He is and we
are who we are, that relationship must be defined and regulated very carefully,
and we are not the ones who do the defining and regulating.  So it is a “religious relationship,” a
relationship with God which is governed by order and sound doctrine.
Cain’s problem was not that he didn’t want a relationship
with God.  He wanted one, but he wanted
to be in control of it.  He wanted to
offer God the sacrifice that he chose to offer, rather than the one God had
taught him to offer.  He wanted to change
the terms of the relationship.  God
responded by rejecting that sacrifice and calling on Cain to repent.  Over and over we can see the same pattern being
repeated.  Every kind of sin there is
basically boils down to this impulse. 
Even atheists, whether they are willing to admit it or not, are demanding
to have a relationship with God on their terms, because they insist on the
right to enjoy God’s good creation without submitting to Him.  This is right at the very essence of the sin
of idolatry.  The practice of idol
worship was at its heart a desire to fix and control one’s relationship to the
god, governing my relationship to the god by the things that I myself have
made.
God is sovereign over us and can never be anything but
sovereign.  We can never be in charge of
our relationship with God.  So whether or
not we will have a relationship with God is not the question.  As His creatures, we will always be in
relationship with Him.  The question is,
whether we will submit to His rules for that relationship, or whether we will
insist on writing our own.  This
principle will be reflected in everything we do, and it will be seen in our
worship above all else.  Is our worship
driven by God’s own revealed truth?  Or
is it driven by our feelings, opinions, and priorities?  Do we desire to generate certain kinds of
emotional experiences and call that worship, or do we desire to submit
ourselves to the God that made us? 
We are called to a religious relationship with God, and that
relationship will be an extremely blessed one. 
God has all the treasures in the world, and desires to give them to His
people.  He will always do so in a way
that is true to His own nature, that reflects His sovereignty and rule.  In grace, He sovereignly reveals the truth to
His people, opens our eyes to the true nature of our religious relationship
with Him, so that we can be conformed to the truth of His sovereignty and
receive all of His gracious gifts.

This is all revealed in Christ.  His life
was one of perfect obedience in submission to the will of His Father.  His death showed that fellowship with God can
only be had in conformity to His law; since God’s law demanded death for our
sin, that price had to be paid, and it was. 
His call to us is to believe on Him, to be covered by the blood He shed
for us, and thus enter into a right and gracious relationship with God which
honors both His sovereign justice and His gracious love.  This is the heart of what people find so
offensive in the cross.  It expresses
perfectly the truth that our relationship with God can only ever be had on His
terms, not on ours, that God will sooner undergo the horrors of death Himself
than give up His sovereign right to rule.

It only reveals the desperate condition of sinful man all
the more that so many continue to reject this perfect offer of fellowship and
continue to insist on writing the rules of our relationship with God ourselves.  It would be like the Gauls trying to dictate
to Caesar the terms of their surrender after Caesar had utterly crushed
them.  God holds all the cards here, yet
He has approached us in grace and mercy. 
It is only reasonable then that we give up any attempt to try to dictate
to God what our relationship with Him will look like, and humbly and simply
look to Him to instruct us in the religious relationship, the sovereignly
ordered worship and life to which He has called us.

Getting to Know God

From the church site:

Like a Japanese gardener who shapes a miniature tree over years by carefully tying its branches and trunk in particularly chosen ways, so the worship of God, through patient repetition, will shape us. It will guide us in the way we grow. This is not a matter of simply showing up, but truly being bound to God by personal trust and faith, since it is the personal relationship that forms the connection, not simply physical presence or outward activity. This shaping will not happen all at once; the change will often be imperceptible. We might not think anything is going on at all. But over time, those forces will gently, slowly and certainly shape someone. If the worship services we choose to go to are dominated by the opinions and ideas of men, then that is what will shape us, and our hearts will be far from God. But if the content of our worship is controlled by the personality of Jehovah, then we will be conformed to the image of Jehovah.